Fitri, Intan Dina (2020) Student Self-evaluative judgment of teacher and peer written corrective feedback. Masters thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik.
|
Text
HALAMAN PERNYATAAN ORISINALITAS.pdf Download (595kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
HALAMAN PENGESAHAN.pdf Download (437kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIYAH UNUTK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIK.pdf Download (122kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Download (292kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Download (238kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Download (304kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Download (454kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://eprints.umg.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (734kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (183kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (315kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Download (467kB) | Preview |
Abstract
ABSTRACT Fitri, I. D. 2020.Student Self-Evaluative Judgment of Teacher and Peer Written Corrective Feedback.Thesis.English Education Study Program. Magister Program. University of Muhammadiyah Gresik. First Advisor: Dr. Khoirul Anwar, M. Pd Second Advisor: Dr. YudhiArifani, M.Pd. Student self-evaluative judgment was important to evaluate the practice of teacher and peers written corrective feedback (WCF). It could be used to determine whether both methods were a proper method for student or not. Inappropriate WCF could damage students writing improvement and influenced student psychology aspect. This study aimed to identify student’ self-evaluative judgment of teacher and peer WCF, correlated them with student’ writing ability, and compared both of WCF methods. This research employed quantitative using survey, correlation and comparative design. Data were collected from 105 L2 learners using close questionnaires and writing test. Student’ writing ability scores were taken from their teacher. By using quantitative research, this study found that first, both teacher and peer WCF had satisfied result on student’ self-evaluative judgment. It meant that both methods were acceptable as an appropriate method in learning writing. Second, student with higher agreement of both teacher and peer WCF practice, would be also has a higher score on their writing. Third, student preferred to use teacher WCF than peer WCF. However, peer WCF still useful to be an adjunct for teacher WCF practice since it could improve student writing ability. Key words: Student’ Self Evaluative Judgment, Written Corrective Feedback.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Student’ Self Evaluative Judgment, Written Corrective Feedback. |
| Subjects: | English Education Education |
| Divisions: | Postgraduate Programs > Master Program in Teaching as a Foreign Language |
| Depositing User: | Intan Dina Fitri |
| Date Deposited: | 23 Jun 2020 06:00 |
| Last Modified: | 29 Jun 2020 07:47 |
| URI: | http://eprints.umg.ac.id/id/eprint/3650 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
